NASA postpones Artemis II SLS rocket rollback, citing bad weather

NASA is constantly being hit by anomalies and less-than-ideal weather conditions.
PUBLISHED FEB 24, 2026
NASA’s Artemis II SLS rocket and Orion spacecraft stand vertical on mobile launcher 1 at Launch Complex 39B at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida on Tuesday, Feb. 10, 2026. (Cover Image Source: NASA/Ben Smegelsky)
NASA’s Artemis II SLS rocket and Orion spacecraft stand vertical on mobile launcher 1 at Launch Complex 39B at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida on Tuesday, Feb. 10, 2026. (Cover Image Source: NASA/Ben Smegelsky)

Cold temperatures and high winds in Cape Canaveral, Florida, on Tuesday, February 24, 2026, have forced NASA to decide against rolling Artemis II’s massive SLS rocket back to the Vehicle Assembly Building (VAB) on the day. The move is now slated to take place on the following day, February 25. While the probability of moving the 322-foot-tall feat of aerospace engineering was initially slim, thanks to contingency plans made by NASA, a lack of clarity over a helium flow issue to the rocket’s upper stage meant the decision had to be made reluctantly. NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman took to X to express the importance of the rollback: “Regardless of the potential fault, accessing and remediating any of these issues can only be performed in the VAB."



NASA’s EGS (Exploration Ground Systems) team is responsible for transporting the vehicle with the aid of the Crawler-Transporter 2. The name comes from the incredibly slow and steady pace at which the rocket is transported to and from the VAB, with the four-mile trek taking up to 12 hours. Nevertheless, with the stakes being so high, EGS can never be too careful, given the fact that high wind speeds have been prevailing at the Kennedy Space Center. The transporter, which is over 50 years old and was used for moving Apollo’s Saturn V rockets as well, has undergone modifications to make it fit to carry the modern lunar rocket. 

Crawler-transporter 2 (CT-2) moves slowly up the ramp to the surface of Launch Pad 39B for a fit check on May 22, 2018, at NASA's Kennedy Space Center in Florida. The test drive to the pad confirms that all of the recent modifications to CT-2 and Pad 39B are operational to support Artemis II. (Image Source: NASA | Leif Heimbold)
Crawler-transporter 2 (CT-2) moves slowly up the ramp to the surface of Launch Pad 39B for a fit check on May 22, 2018, at NASA's Kennedy Space Center in Florida. (Image Source: NASA | Leif Heimbold)

What this move means is that a launch on March 6 is beyond the realms of possibility for NASA. Consequently, the four-member crew of Commander Reid Wiseman, Pilot Victor Glover, Mission Specialist Christina Koch (all from NASA), and Mission Specialist Jeremy Hansen of CSA (Canadian Space Agency) came out of quarantine as well. They only need to be in quarantine for a fortnight before launch. Additionally, NASA noted the postponement of the rollback to Wednesday will give teams enough time to "complete preparations at the launch pad that were limited by high winds in the area."

NASA astronaut Christina Koch and CSA astronaut Jeremy Hansen take off on a T-38 training flight from Ellington Field on February 11, 2026. (Representative Image Source: NASA | Brendan Finnegan)
NASA astronaut Christina Koch and CSA astronaut Jeremy Hansen take off on a T-38 training flight from Ellington Field on February 11, 2026. (Representative Image Source: NASA | Brendan Finnegan)

NASA is evidently looking to save as much time as possible so as to keep hopes alive for a launch in April. As soon as the rocket is back at the VAB, teams will begin installing the platforms to access the area of the helium issue. Reflecting the disappointment felt by enthusiasts around the world as well as the people at NASA after the ICPS issue surfaced, Isaacman also stated, “As mentioned previously, we will begin preparations for rollback, and this will take the March launch window out of consideration. I understand people are disappointed by this development. That disappointment is felt most by the team at NASA, who have been working tirelessly to prepare for this great endeavor.” 



Despite what has been one setback after another, Isaacman shared his optimism for the future of the Artemis program. “We will return in the years ahead, we will build a Moon base, and undertake what should be continuous missions to and from the lunar environment. Where we begin with this architecture and flight rate is not where it will end," Isaacman stated.

More on Starlust

Artemis II crew will use this roller-coaster-inspired system to escape to safety during emergency

Artemis II's free return trajectory: What it is and how it will protect the astronauts

MORE STORIES

The next decade will see commercial entities like Vast carry on research in low-Earth orbit.
17 hours ago
Human waste may be the key in sustainable colonization on Mars and the Moon.
21 hours ago
18 healthy female participants were placed in a simulated microgravity environment as part of the study.
1 day ago
Five satellites were lost as the private rocket mission ended minutes after liftoff.
1 day ago
NASA has released the food menu for the Artemis II mission, and it is rather elaborate.
1 day ago
Artemis IV and V will see astronauts return to the surface of the Moon while Artemis III will essentially be another test flight.
2 days ago
While the primary reason of SLS rollback to VAB has been addressed, more items remain on the agenda.
2 days ago
Suit checks, robotics tests, and cargo loading usher a busy week aboard the International Space Station.
3 days ago
A safety review urges structural fixes as NASA expands Artemis and commercial space ties.
4 days ago
Artemis III will no longer land on the Moon. That objective has been shifted onto the Artemis IV mission.
4 days ago