NASA postpones Artemis II SLS rocket rollback, citing bad weather

NASA is constantly being hit by anomalies and less-than-ideal weather conditions.
NASA’s Artemis II SLS rocket and Orion spacecraft stand vertical on mobile launcher 1 at Launch Complex 39B at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida on Tuesday, Feb. 10, 2026. (Cover Image Source: NASA/Ben Smegelsky)
NASA’s Artemis II SLS rocket and Orion spacecraft stand vertical on mobile launcher 1 at Launch Complex 39B at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida on Tuesday, Feb. 10, 2026. (Cover Image Source: NASA/Ben Smegelsky)

Cold temperatures and high winds in Cape Canaveral, Florida, on Tuesday, February 24, 2026, have forced NASA to decide against rolling Artemis II’s massive SLS rocket back to the Vehicle Assembly Building (VAB) on the day. The move is now slated to take place on the following day, February 25. While the probability of moving the 322-foot-tall feat of aerospace engineering was initially slim, thanks to contingency plans made by NASA, a lack of clarity over a helium flow issue to the rocket’s upper stage meant the decision had to be made reluctantly. NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman took to X to express the importance of the rollback: “Regardless of the potential fault, accessing and remediating any of these issues can only be performed in the VAB."



NASA’s EGS (Exploration Ground Systems) team is responsible for transporting the vehicle with the aid of the Crawler-Transporter 2. The name comes from the incredibly slow and steady pace at which the rocket is transported to and from the VAB, with the four-mile trek taking up to 12 hours. Nevertheless, with the stakes being so high, EGS can never be too careful, given the fact that high wind speeds have been prevailing at the Kennedy Space Center. The transporter, which is over 50 years old and was used for moving Apollo’s Saturn V rockets as well, has undergone modifications to make it fit to carry the modern lunar rocket. 

Crawler-transporter 2 (CT-2) moves slowly up the ramp to the surface of Launch Pad 39B for a fit check on May 22, 2018, at NASA's Kennedy Space Center in Florida. The test drive to the pad confirms that all of the recent modifications to CT-2 and Pad 39B are operational to support Artemis II. (Image Source: NASA | Leif Heimbold)
Crawler-transporter 2 (CT-2) moves slowly up the ramp to the surface of Launch Pad 39B for a fit check on May 22, 2018, at NASA's Kennedy Space Center in Florida. (Image Source: NASA | Leif Heimbold)

What this move means is that a launch on March 6 is beyond the realms of possibility for NASA. Consequently, the four-member crew of Commander Reid Wiseman, Pilot Victor Glover, Mission Specialist Christina Koch (all from NASA), and Mission Specialist Jeremy Hansen of CSA (Canadian Space Agency) came out of quarantine as well. They only need to be in quarantine for a fortnight before launch. Additionally, NASA noted the postponement of the rollback to Wednesday will give teams enough time to "complete preparations at the launch pad that were limited by high winds in the area."

NASA astronaut Christina Koch and CSA astronaut Jeremy Hansen take off on a T-38 training flight from Ellington Field on February 11, 2026. (Representative Image Source: NASA | Brendan Finnegan)
NASA astronaut Christina Koch and CSA astronaut Jeremy Hansen take off on a T-38 training flight from Ellington Field on February 11, 2026. (Representative Image Source: NASA | Brendan Finnegan)

NASA is evidently looking to save as much time as possible so as to keep hopes alive for a launch in April. As soon as the rocket is back at the VAB, teams will begin installing the platforms to access the area of the helium issue. Reflecting the disappointment felt by enthusiasts around the world as well as the people at NASA after the ICPS issue surfaced, Isaacman also stated, “As mentioned previously, we will begin preparations for rollback, and this will take the March launch window out of consideration. I understand people are disappointed by this development. That disappointment is felt most by the team at NASA, who have been working tirelessly to prepare for this great endeavor.” 



Despite what has been one setback after another, Isaacman shared his optimism for the future of the Artemis program. “We will return in the years ahead, we will build a Moon base, and undertake what should be continuous missions to and from the lunar environment. Where we begin with this architecture and flight rate is not where it will end," Isaacman stated.

More on Starlust

Artemis II crew will use this roller-coaster-inspired system to escape to safety during emergency

Artemis II's free return trajectory: What it is and how it will protect the astronauts

MORE STORIES

The engines were built by L3Harris and sent for integration with the SLS rocket's core stage.
2 days ago
While the first two scrubs were attributed to bad weather, the launch was postponed for the third time due to an issue with the Pegasus XL rocket itself.
2 days ago
As part of its efforts to get New Glenn to fly again this year, Blue Origin is reinventing the launch pad where the NG-4 hotfire test explosion took place.
3 days ago
Each of the four landers for the $30 billion Moon Base will be an updated version of designs that have already flown.
4 days ago
The spacewalk lasted well over 7 hours, 40 minutes longer than expected. Here are the details.
4 days ago
The mission will restore Swift to the state it was in when launched in November 2004.
5 days ago
Get ready for aerial shows, Artemis 2 patches, Moon Base models, and a chance to win NASA prizes!
5 days ago
The transfer of cryogenic fuel between two vehicles in space has never been attempted.
5 days ago
The Soyuz 11 crew docked with the first space station, setting many records prior to their demise.
5 days ago
The loss of three cosmonauts sent shock waves around the world and triggered an increased stress on safety.
5 days ago