Scientists stunned by fireworks in nearby galaxy: 'Something unusual is going on in these objects'

NASA's Chandra telescope caught sources previously identified as supernova remnants displaying dramatic, completely unexpected variations in brightness.
Composite image of M83.  Cover Image Source [X-ray: NASA/CXC/SAO; Optical: NASA/ESA/AURA/STScI, Hubble Heritage Team, W. Blair (STScI/Johns Hopkins University) and R. O'Connell (University of Virginia)
Composite image of M83. Cover Image Source [X-ray: NASA/CXC/SAO; Optical: NASA/ESA/AURA/STScI, Hubble Heritage Team, W. Blair (STScI/Johns Hopkins University) and R. O'Connell (University of Virginia)

A group of researchers came across something surprising when they turned NASA's Chandra X-ray telescope towards Messier 83 (M83)—a star-forming galaxy located 15 million light-years from Earth. Analyzing 14 years of data gathered by the observatory, the team found sources within the galaxy that had previously been identified as supernova remnants display dramatic variations in X-ray brightness. The corresponding study was published on June 11 in The Astrophysical Journal, and the findings were showcased at the American Astronomical Society meeting in Pasadena, California.



The researchers had expected supernova remnants older than a century to gradually fade in X-rays. However, seeing about half of the 22 sources in the sample show variable X-ray brightness over the 14 years really left them scratching their heads. "We knew that individual X-ray sources could vary dramatically, but finding that so many supernova remnants were behaving this way was a real surprise," said Andrea Prestwich of the Catholic University of America, the lead author of the study, in a statement. "Something unusual is going on in these objects." 

The Chandra X-ray Observatory is the world’s most powerful X-ray telescope. (Image Source: NASA/CXC & J. Vaughan)
The Chandra X-ray Observatory is the world’s most powerful X-ray telescope. (Representative Image Source: NASA | CXC & J. Vaughan)

So far, the team has been able to find a straightforward explanation for only one of the remnants, called SN 1957D, which was first observed 70 years ago and is colliding with the material around the explosion site, producing X-rays in the process. The same explanation, however, does not apply to other sources, as there is no proof that they were born in the last hundred years or so. That being said, there are a couple of likely scenarios that the researchers are considering.

The remnants of a Type 1a supernova that erupted in 1604. Unlike with a nova such as T CrB, a Type 1a supernova completely obliterates the white dwarf that causes it. (Representative Image Source: NASA/CXC/NCSU/DSS/M. Burkey et al)
The remnants of a Type 1a supernova that erupted in 1604. (Representative Image Source: NASA/CXC/NCSU/DSS/M. Burkey et al.)

The most likely of the two scenarios is that each X-ray source is one of a pair of massive stars that used to orbit each other, the bigger of which exploded as a supernova, leaving the other to hang around a black hole or an ultra-dense neutron star. Each black hole or neutron star has since been siphoning material off the survivor, with the immense gravitational pull at play heating the material and producing X-rays in the process. Such systems are known as high-mass X-ray binaries (HMXBs). The second possible explanation is that instead of pulling material from the companion star, each black hole or neutron star may be feeding on the remnants of the original explosion. "This could be an example of cosmic recycling, where debris from the explosion falls back onto the very object the supernova created," said co-author Roy Kilgard of Wesleyan University. "And it's quite possible that both explanations are at play—different sources in our sample may have different origins."

Composite image of M51 with data from Chandra (purple) with optical data (red, green and blue) taken with ground-based telescopes. (Image Source: NASA)
Composite image of M51. (Chandra: NASA/CXC/SAO; Astrobin/Optical: C.Björk, T.Bähnck, S.Donoso, J.Gentillon, A. and D.Grelin, S.Guberski, R. Hall, T.Heuberger, J.Jacks, P.Kent, Br.Meyers, W.Ostling, N.Puig, T.Schaeffer, F.Schöfbänker, M.Vasilev)

Kilgard was also involved with Zoe Hoiland of Vassar College in the study of another nearby galaxy. Designated M51, the galaxy seems to have a similar population of X-ray sources as M83. This indicates the features in M83, as surprising as they might be, might be common across star-forming galaxies.

More on Starlust

NASA’s Chandra stitches decades of data on supernova remnant into its longest video yet

Not every galaxy has a supermassive black hole like the Milky Way's, NASA's Chandra Telescope finds

MORE STORIES

Detecting cold, star-forming gas was difficult, and the findings will help understand galaxy growth.
5 hours ago
Alien civilizations may have left traces. We just may not have been looking in the right place.
6 hours ago
Interstellar travel has near-insurmountable barriers, and that's why no alien has shown up yet.
1 day ago
Located around 26,000 light-years from Earth, the remnant is one of the closest to Sagittarius A*.
1 day ago
Dark matter doesn't interact with anything but gravity. So what happens to it in the vicinity of black holes, where gravity bends the very fabric of space-time.
2 days ago
The team, which included Nobel laureates, debunked claims that cosmic expansion was slowing down.
4 days ago
This offers a glimpse into when the first galaxies emerged from the darkness of the early universe.
4 days ago
These fierce winds strip away star-forming gas, pushing early galaxies to the brink of death.
4 days ago
The flickering quasar is from the universe's infancy, when it was just 850 million years old.
5 days ago
Scientists have described for the first time how spacetime could crystallize into a tiny black hole.
5 days ago