Build, buy or outsource? NASA recalibrates its acquisition strategy in the 2025 safety report

A safety review urges structural fixes as NASA expands Artemis and commercial space ties.
Image of a SpaceX Crew Dragon spacecraft integrated with a Falcon 9 rocket during processing inside a NASA facility. (Representative Cover Image Source: NASA)
Image of a SpaceX Crew Dragon spacecraft integrated with a Falcon 9 rocket during processing inside a NASA facility. (Representative Cover Image Source: NASA)

The 2025 annual report from NASA's Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel (ASAP) is out now. The space agency’s safety achievements have been duly acknowledged, but the report does warn of some systemic risks. It talks about some of NASA’s biggest internal challenges related to workforce, acquisition strategy, governance, budgets, and increasing mission complexity. The panel suggests there is some risk of structural strain in the long run, as NASA manages Artemis, ISS operations, commercial partnerships and experimental programs simultaneously.

A NASA logo is displayed at the entrance to the Mary W. Jackson NASA Headquarters building (Cover Image Source: Getty | Kevin Carter)
A NASA logo is displayed at the entrance to the Mary W. Jackson NASA Headquarters building (Image Source: Getty | Kevin Carter)

The most significant takeaway from the ASAP report is that the agency is recalibrating its acquisition strategies for human spaceflight capabilities. NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman specifically referenced a “build versus buy versus service procurement approach.” Through this, NASA is reviewing the decision-making process behind choosing whether to build systems internally, buy hardware from industry, or just procure services commercially. This directly affects how much authority NASA gets to have over mission-critical systems, while also safeguarding its commercial partnerships.

The Headquarters of SpaceX in Hawthorne, California, with a Falcon 9 booster in March 2024. (Representative Photo by Sven Piper / Getty Images)
The Headquarters of SpaceX in Hawthorne, California, with a Falcon 9 booster in March 2024. (Representative Photo by Sven Piper / Getty Images)

NASA’s “build vs. buy vs service procurement approach” could be a huge turning point. The U.S. organization’s increasing reliance on private partners needs to be kept in check. This reflects directly, even in imminent programs like Artemis, whose architecture depends on multiple providers like SpaceX, or the commercial low Earth orbit transition that is underway. The “build” part specifically strengthens NASA’s institutional capabilities and knowledge. On the same note, Isaacman mentioned restoring core competencies and converting some contractor roles to civil servants.

SpaceX’s proposed Starship human landing system (HLS) up against some other lunar landers. (Representative Image Source: NASA)
SpaceX’s proposed Starship human landing system (HLS) up against some other lunar landers. (Representative Image Source: NASA)

As for the ongoing and imminent lunar missions, the report seems confident of the readiness of Artemis II and its progress, despite delays. However, it has now been decided that Artemis III will be just an Earth-orbit test and not a crewed lunar landing mission, as it had more risk and needed more complex integration than Artemis II. The mission’s system architecture, like landers and commercial elements, demanded more coordination and, therefore, the panel advised re-examining mission objectives. NASA is now planning to achieve a successful crewed lunar landing on the Artemis IV mission, slated for 2028. 

Boeing and NASA teams work around Boeing's CST-100 Starliner spacecraft after it landed at White Sands Missile Range's Space Harbor on May 25, 2022. (Representative Cover Photo by Bill Ingalls / NASA via Getty Images)
Boeing and NASA teams work around Boeing's CST-100 Starliner spacecraft after it landed at White Sands Missile Range's Space Harbor on May 25, 2022. (Representative Cover Photo by Bill Ingalls / NASA via Getty Images)

The ASAP report did not evade lessons from 2024’s Boeing Starliner Crewed Flight Test. NASA classified it as a Type A mishap, which is its most severe failure category. Earlier this month, Isaacman had openly called NASA and Boeing’s decision-making and leadership more troubling than hardware or engineering failures. The panel recommended quickly declaring any mishaps or close calls, as that makes the institution more transparent and accountable to the public. This would make sure there are no delays or inaccuracies when a problem is reported, all of which leads to stronger corrective action.

Artwork of the International Space Station and the shuttle (Representative Cover Image Source: Getty | LEONELLO CALVETTI)
Artwork of the International Space Station and the shuttle (Representative Image Source: Getty | LEONELLO CALVETTI)

The panel also highlights new workforce plans to manage NASA’s growing dependency on its commercial partners. Internal expertise and technical authority are the need of the hour. So, the agency needs to maintain strong in-house engineering and operational knowledge, and converting contractor roles to civil servant positions can help achieve it, as advised in the report. NASA also has to carefully coordinate its future plans to transition from ISS deorbit to more commercial low Earth orbit platforms.

An artist’s concept of the Earth, Moon, and Mars (Image Source: NASA)
An artist’s concept of the Earth, Moon, and Mars (Image Source: NASA)

The ASAP report also noted NASA’s first flight of the X-59 Low-Boom Demonstrator, as Isaacman promoted overhauling and accelerating programs along these lines. Additionally, the panel also praised stronger oversight via the Moon to Mars Program Office, the ISS’s continued safe operations, and scientific advancements in astronaut health research. The agency’s strategies, governance and oversight systems must keep up with the speed of their programs and scale accordingly, if they intend to keep their place as the world’s leading space agency.

More on Starlust

Trump's 2026 budget reimagines NASA's Artemis, hands moon missions to private sector

NASA planning to build a 100 kilowatt nuclear reactor on the moon by 2030

MORE STORIES

On May 26, NASA announced that Blue Origin would play a big role in setting up the initial elements of its Moon Base this year. Now, the space agency may have to reconsider.
1 day ago
Prior to Thursday's explosion, New Glenn had faced a number of issues, from delays to failed tests.
1 day ago
The explosion seemed to begin from close to the engines before the upper stage exploded as well.
1 day ago
The experiment was delivered to the Tiangong space station on a recent resupply mission.
2 days ago
China is merging its robotic lunar missions and its human spaceflight program into a single effort.
2 days ago
The to-do list included a sun-watching telescope, a broken antenna, and a birthday wish from orbit.
2 days ago
As per Einstein, time is not universal but relative. The faster you travel, the more slowly time moves for you.
2 days ago
The project is planned in three phases, leading to human presence on the Moon from 2032 onwards.
3 days ago
The redesigned Artemis III mission will test integrated operations between the Orion spacecraft and either one or both of the lunar landers being developed by SpaceX and Blue Origin.
3 days ago
Significant updates about the roadmap to setting up the first lunar habitat were divulged by NASA leadership during a press conference held on May 26.
3 days ago