How is Artemis II SLS rocket different from Apollo era's Saturn V and SpaceX's Starship?

The Saturn V was meant for deep space missions like the SLS and Starship but was very different from the modern rockets.
UPDATED APR 1, 2026
(L) Apollo 11 Saturn V lifts off on July 16, 1969. (M) NASA’s Artemis II SLS rocket inside the VAB on March 17, 2026. (R) Image of Starship test vehicle taken on September 30, 2019. (Cover Image Source: left and middle by NASA, right pic by SpaceX)
(L) Apollo 11 Saturn V lifts off on July 16, 1969. (M) NASA’s Artemis II SLS rocket inside the VAB on March 17, 2026. (R) Image of Starship test vehicle taken on September 30, 2019. (Cover Image Source: left and middle by NASA, right pic by SpaceX)

On April 1, 2026, NASA’s Space Launch System (SLS) rocket is all set to lift off with the Artemis II crew aboard the Orion spacecraft. It’s been more than 50 years since humans last flew around the Moon and a lot has changed about spaceflight and technology. So, just how different is the Artemis program’s SLS launch vehicle compared to its Apollo era counterpart, Saturn V? And how do these fare against the fully reusable Starship by SpaceX? All three super-heavy-lift rockets were built for deep space missions, but there’s a lot that separates them.

A view of the Apollo 9 Lunar Module (LM),
A view of the Apollo 9 Lunar Module (LM), "Spider," in a lunar landing configuration, as photographed from the Command and Service Modules. (Image Source: Corbis via Getty Images)

Size and scale

From sheer size alone, Starship is a different beast from both the SLS and Saturn V. The fact that it’s the tallest and the heaviest is a clear sign of its payload ambition. The SLS, meanwhile, is the shortest of the three. The Apollo launch vehicle featured three stages, while both the SLS and the Starship have two stages each.

Starship V3 seen leaving the build site toward the launch area to begin prelaunch testing operations. (Cover Image Source: SpaceX)
Starship V3 seen leaving the build site toward the launch area to begin prelaunch testing operations. (Image Source: SpaceX)
  • Height: 363 ft (Saturn V) vs 322 ft (SLS) vs 403 ft (Starship V2)/408 ft (Starship V3)
  • Weight (during liftoff): 6.2 million lbs (Saturn V) vs 5.75 million lbs (SLS) vs ~11 million lbs (Starship)
  • Diameter: 33 ft (Saturn V) vs 27.6 ft (SLS) vs 29.5 ft (Starship)

Power and performance

In terms of power too, Starship’s specs overshadow both the SLS and Saturn V. The Starship V3 uses 33 Raptor engines as opposed to the five F-1 engines in Saturn V. On the other hand, the SLS uses four RS-25 engines and two solid rocket boosters.

Infographic depicting the four RS-25 engines that are situated on NASA’s Space Launch System rocket for Artemis II, the first crewed Artemis mission to the Moon. (Image Source: NASA/Kevin O'Brien)
Infographic depicting the four RS-25 engines that are situated on NASA’s Space Launch System rocket for Artemis II, the first crewed Artemis mission to the Moon. (Image Source: NASA/Kevin O'Brien)
  • Engines (main propulsion): 5 F-1 (Saturn V) vs 4 RS-25 + 2 solid boosters (SLS) vs 33 Raptor (Starship)
  • Thrust (during liftoff): 7.6 million lbf (Saturn V) vs 8.8 million lbf (SLS) vs ~16.7 million lbf (Starship)
  • Payload to trans-lunar injection: 50 tons (Saturn V) vs 27 tons (SLS Block 1) vs total payload capacity of about 250 tons (Starship)

Crew capacity and history

The crew capsules on both the Saturn V and SLS share the familiar cone shape, but the latter comes with a crew capacity of four compared to the former's three, in addition to advanced avionics, life, support, and power systems. Here too, Starship is a class apart, with SpaceX claiming that it can carry up to 100 people on long-duration missions.



  • Crew capsule: Apollo CSM (Saturn V) vs Orion (SLS) vs Starship (same name as the fully integrated system)
  • Launch history: 13 (Saturn V) vs 1 (SLS) vs multiple test flights, no operational missions yet (Starship)

Correction in the article published on March 30, 2026: In the crew capacity, it was written three for SLS, whereas it is four. The correction has been made and is reflecting now. 

More on Starlust

SpaceX conducts first Starship V3 static fire test in preparation for April test flight

All hands on deck: The international collaboration behind Artemis II's SLS rocket and Orion capsule

MORE STORIES

The third New Glenn mission, dubbed NG-3, is expected to launch massive broadband satellites into low Earth orbit.
10 minutes ago
Northrop Grumman’s Cygnus XL was captured by the Canadarm2, after which mission control in Houston installed it on the Unity module of the ISS.
1 hour ago
Four fifths of the SLS core stage will travel on the Peagus barge from NASA's Michoud Assembly Facility in New Orleans to the Kennedy Space Center in Florida.
1 day ago
The use of ultralight graphene aerogels for propulsion with a push using light could be the way forward.
1 day ago
NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman reiterated that this was not a once-in-a-lifetime moment, but rather the beginning of more exciting missions.
1 day ago
China is the United States' biggest competitor in the modern-era space race.
1 day ago
Artemis II, which launched on April 10 after weeks of delay, has successfully orbited the Moon and returned to Earth with a wealth of data to fuel future lunar missions.
2 days ago
NASA astronauts Jack Hathaway and Chris Williams will capture the cargo using the Canadarm2 robotic arm at approximately 12:50 p.m. EDT.
2 days ago
The crew could be seen being quite emotional on being received with such warmth by the audience.
3 days ago
NASA Chief Jared Isaacman hails crew, reaffirms permanent Moon base plans and future missions.
3 days ago