Sensitive radio observations looked for technosignatures on 3I/ATLAS and found silence

The search focused on narrowband signals used by all of humanity's spacecraft but found nothing.
PUBLISHED DEC 31, 2025
Hubble captured this image of the interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS on July 21, 2025, when the comet was 277 million miles from Earth. [Cover Image Source: NASA, ESA, David Jewitt (UCLA); Image Processing: Joseph DePasquale (STScI)]
Hubble captured this image of the interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS on July 21, 2025, when the comet was 277 million miles from Earth. [Cover Image Source: NASA, ESA, David Jewitt (UCLA); Image Processing: Joseph DePasquale (STScI)]

When a mysterious object from outside our solar system sweeps past Earth, scientists pay attention. In December 2025, astronomers did exactly that when 3I/ATLAS, only the third known interstellar object ever discovered, made its closest approach to our planet. Along with studying its comet-like behavior, researchers asked a more provocative question: could it be artificial?NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope observed interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS Aug. 6, with its Near-Infrared Spectrograph instrument (Image Source: NASA/James Webb Space Telescope)

NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope observed interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS on Aug. 6, with its Near-Infrared Spectrograph instrument (Image Source: NASA/James Webb Space Telescope)

To find answers, researchers pointed the 100-meter Green Bank Telescope, which is part of the Breakthrough Listen program designed to look for extraterrestrial life, at 3I/ATLAS. What followed was a series of careful and sensitive radio searches on the interstellar visitor. The result, however, was clear and quiet. As the researchers state plainly in their research paper, “We report a nondetection of candidate signals down to the 100 mW level.” 

Interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS is seen in this composite image captured on Nov. 6 by the Europa Ultraviolet Spectrograph instrument on NASA’s Europa Clipper spacecraft. (Image Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/SWRI)
Interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS is seen in this composite image captured on Nov. 6 by the Europa Ultraviolet Spectrograph instrument on NASA’s Europa Clipper spacecraft. (Image Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/SWRI)

The observations were carried out on December 18, 2025, just one day before 3I/ATLAS passed closest to Earth. The researchers conducted the search across four radio bands, from 1 to 12 gigahertz. The search focused on narrowband radio signals because they are efficient for transmitting across interstellar distances and are widely considered a strong sign of technological activity. As the authors explain, “All of humanity’s spacecraft, including the now-interstellar craft Voyager 1 and Voyager 2, communicate via such signals.” According to the paper, initial analysis detected more than 470,000 signal hits. But most of these were quickly identified as human-made interference, as they also appeared in off-target scans.

This image, taken by the MAVEN spacecraft on Oct. 9, shows the halo of gas and dust, or coma, surrounding comet 3I/ATLAS. (Image Credit: NASA/Goddard/LASP/CU Boulder)
This image, taken by the MAVEN spacecraft on Oct. 9, shows the halo of gas and dust, or coma, surrounding comet 3I/ATLAS. (Image Credit: NASA/Goddard/LASP/CU Boulder)

After doing a strict filtering, only nine candidate signals remained. Each one was then carefully examined. None passed the final test. The researchers conclude that all remaining candidates could be explained by known sources of radio contamination, noting that “we visually inspect the nine events and… rule out all of them as RFI.” In other words, radio noise was not alien technology, and it explains everything they saw. One of the most striking results of the study is how sensitive the search was.

NASA’s Hubble Space Telescope reobserved interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS with its Wide Field Camera 3 instrument. (Image Source: NASA | Photo by NASA, ESA, STScI)
NASA’s Hubble Space Telescope reobserved interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS with its Wide Field Camera 3 instrument. (Image Source: NASA | Photo by NASA, ESA, STScI)

The team calculated that if a transmitter at 3I/ATLAS were sending out radio waves equally in all directions, it would have to be weaker than 0.1 watts to escape detection. To put that in perspective, the authors point out that “a cell phone is an approximately isotropic continuous-wave transmitter at a level of ∼1 W.” That means the survey would have even detected someone making a phone call from space. However, fortunately or unfortunately, the survey concluded, "There are no isotropic continuous-wave transmitters above 0.1W at the location of 3I/ATLAS," which joins its predecessors, Oumuamua and Borisov, in appearing to be a natural object rather than an artificial probe.

The High Resolution Imaging Science Experiment (HiRISE) camera aboard NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter captured this image of interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS on Oct. 2, 2025. At the time it was imaged, the comet was about 0.2 astronomical units (19 million miles, or 30 million kilometers) from the spacecraft. (Image Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/University of Arizona)
The High Resolution Imaging Science Experiment (HiRISE) camera aboard NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter captured this image of interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS on Oct. 2, 2025. At the time it was imaged, the comet was about 0.2 astronomical units (19 million miles, or 30 million kilometers) from the spacecraft. (Image Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/University of Arizona)

While the idea of interstellar technology is fascinating, the scientists stress caution. As they write, “There is currently no evidence to suggest that ISOs are anything other than natural astrophysical objects.” Still, the search itself is important. Interstellar objects are rare, and each one offers a unique opportunity. 

More on Starlust

From life on Mars to interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS: 5 space discoveries that defined 2025

Where is interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS now? Current position and visibility

MORE STORIES

Oxygen on exoplanets can be the result of simple chemical processes rather than biological ones.
1 day ago
The river delta could be between 3.7 billion and 4.2 billion years old.
1 day ago
The researchers had initially selected a different target for Hubble.
2 days ago
Helioseismic data traces the solar dynamo to the tachocline about 200,000 km down.
3 days ago
Astronomers trace the Small Magellanic Cloud’s unusual stellar motions to a past cosmic encounter.
3 days ago
Earlier estimates of its age were around 7 billion years, but a new study suggests it’s much older.
4 days ago
What makes this discovery even more interesting is that ices are not known to survive in planetary nebulae.
5 days ago
It all started when a doctoral candidate at the University of Washington found a Sun-like star behaving strangely.
6 days ago
The seasonal lunar name traces back to spring phlox blooms in North America, not the actual color.
Mar 13, 2026
The coronal hole is a recurrent feature, having appeared in the last rotation as well.
Mar 13, 2026