Earth-like exoplanet 41 light-years away has no atmosphere to support life, new JWST data reveals

Whether the planet GJ 1132 b had an atmosphere was long debated due to conflicting old data.
PUBLISHED AUG 30, 2025
This is an artist's impression of the Earth-sized, rocky exoplanet GJ 1132 b, located 41 light-years away around a red dwarf star. (Representative Cover Image Source: Wikimedia Commons | Photo by NASA, ESA, Robert L. Hurt (IPAC))
This is an artist's impression of the Earth-sized, rocky exoplanet GJ 1132 b, located 41 light-years away around a red dwarf star. (Representative Cover Image Source: Wikimedia Commons | Photo by NASA, ESA, Robert L. Hurt (IPAC))

The possibility of conflicting data was not new in astronomy, and recent research put one such data to rest. The M-dwarf rocky exoplanet GJ 1132 b had a varied history regarding an existing atmosphere. However, new observational data from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) indicate that it most definitely does not have one. A new paper by researchers was published on the arXiv preprint server, which could have wider implications for exoplanet research. The study used two established transits and two new transits of the telescope to develop its conclusion.

Astronomers have found two so-called super-Earths orbiting the star, dubbing them Gliese 887 b and c. (Representative Image Source: Getty Images | Photo by MARK GARLICK/SCIENCE PHOTO LIBRARY)
Astronomers have found two so-called super-Earths orbiting the star, dubbing them Gliese 887 b and c. (Representative Image Source: Getty Images | Photo by MARK GARLICK/SCIENCE PHOTO LIBRARY)

This conclusion was an update to a previous paper showing conflicting data about the presence of an atmosphere on GJ 1132 b. This was based on two original JWST transits, one implying a water-rich atmosphere, and the second implying that it had none. According to Universe Today, there was a small possibility for a very low-pressure “steam” atmosphere of around 1 mbar. This was, however, neglected for this exoplanet, given its proximity to its star and its lack of water. This possibility can be completely removed by avoiding the first data set from the analysis.

GJ 1132 b is located around an M-dwarf star 41 light-years away, and its rocky surface has a radius and mass only slightly bigger than Earth's. It was situated .0153 AU away from its host star and orbits it every 1.6 days, a distance that holds no proof of an atmosphere. This was due to M-dwarfs being very active with high radiation and flaring, which could strip planets of their atmospheres. However, some models showed an atmosphere with even closer proximity to their M-dwarf parent stars. This was the reason for developing the concept of a “cosmic shoreline.”

TRAPPIST-1D is a small exoplanet orbiting a cooling Red Dwarf Star. (Representative Image Source: Getty Images | Photo by Darryl Fonseka)
TRAPPIST-1D is a small exoplanet orbiting a cooling Red Dwarf Star. (Representative Image Source: Getty Images | Photo by Darryl Fonseka)

This shoreline of irradiation and planet size was a point beyond which planets could not hold on to their atmospheres. The authors investigated what might have caused the initial datasets to confirm an atmosphere. They realized that the star itself had more visible “cool spots” on the surface than during the other three transits. This might have made it look like the planet had an atmosphere in one dataset, affecting the data gained on it. The authors of the study suggested a “leave-one-out” approach for exoplanet datasets, given several of them on a highly variable star. 

The star and six planets from the vantage point of Trappist-1f, a planet around Trappist-1, a red-dwarf star (Representative Image Source: Getty Images | Photo by MARK GARLICK / SCIENCE PHOTO LIBRARY)
The star and six planets from the vantage point of Trappist-1f, a planet around Trappist-1, a red-dwarf star (Representative Image Source: Getty Images | Photo by MARK GARLICK / SCIENCE PHOTO LIBRARY)

This study also employed two different viewing modes of the JWST instrument to collect data. The NIRSpec instrument onboard used both G395H, a higher resolution, and G395M viewing mode, a “medium” resolution. The G395H mode has a “gap” in its data between 3.75um and 3.82um, which affects the result. However, the noise was comparable between the two modes, which nullified the effect. The medium resolution mode on the instrument is recommended for capturing data in one exoplanet transit, but it's safe to use both if time is given for more than one.



 

The researchers who worked on this conclusion bring a definitive end to the speculation that surrounds GJ 1132 b having an atmosphere. The solution they offered to put the matter to rest can also be applied to similar missions. It can be used to avoid such confusion in other studies of exoplanet atmospheres. The most significant result is that it was another addition to the ongoing debate around whether planets around M-dwarf stars can hold onto their atmospheres. Given the observations, calculations of features, and medium of discovery, the answer affirms a negative.

MORE STORIES

For the study, the researchers analyzed 214 of the most massive stars in the Milky Way.
3 days ago
NASA’s TESS tracked the interstellar comet during a special observation period from January 15 to 22, 2026.
3 days ago
While Mercury was quite active in its early days, it has been perceived as dead for a long time because of the static appearance of its surface.
4 days ago
A new paper is looking into the possibility of the collision being a reality and the kind of scientific opportunities it might present.
5 days ago
The ghostly matter co-evolved with regular matter that makes up the visible universe.
6 days ago
How nutrients from Europa's icy shell reach its ocean has been unclear despite several theories.
6 days ago
Earlier research held that meteorite impacts from the solar system's early days were a major source of Earth's water.
7 days ago
The early universe has a lot more massive black holes than suspected.
7 days ago
The Solar Orbiter's observation was a huge step in understanding the mechanism behind powerful solar flares.
Jan 23, 2026
The other two known interstellar comets did not offer such an opportunity.
Jan 22, 2026